• Care Home
  • Care home

Corner Oaks

Overall: Requires improvement read more about inspection ratings

32 Beach Drive, Scratby, Great Yarmouth, NR29 3NP (01508) 570761

Provided and run by:
Red Oaks Care Ltd

Important:

We served (section 29) warning notices on Red Oaks Ltd, at their location of Corner Oaks due to breaches of the regulations in relation to consent to care, and good governance and oversight of their service. This enforcement action was taken as a result of concerns identified at a recent inspection of Corner Oaks, with the intention of supporting the provider to make the necessary level of improvements to return to compliance with the regulations. The warning notices came into effect after the completion of the representations process on 27 March 2025.

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Our current view of the service

Requires improvement

Updated 21 January 2025

We completed assessment visits to Corner Oaks on 03 February and 11 February 2025. This is a service for people with a learning disability and autistic people. At the time of our inspection 6 people were living at the service.

We identified areas of poor governance and oversight arrangements within the service. The provider was not ensuring audits and quality checks were completed to a good standard, and where risks and areas of improvement were identified, these were not always addressed. The registered manager and provider were not ensuring incidents and events happening within the service were reported to external stakeholders including CQC in line with their regulatory responsibilities. People’s abilities to consent to the use of closed circuit television (CCTV) within communal areas of the service had not been thoroughly assessed, and less restrictive alternatives had not been explored to justify ongoing usage. The decision to use CCTV was not being kept under regular review by the provider in line with their regulatory responsibilities. Overall, people received care from compassionate staff, responsive to their needs and ensuring people led meaningful lives. Staff understood people’s needs and used their skills and expertise to maximise people’s levels of independence.

This was the first inspection of the service since they registered. We have identified 2 breaches of the regulations, for consent to care and treatment and good governance. We have assessed the service against ‘Right support, right care, right culture’ guidance to make judgements about whether the provider guaranteed people with a learning disability and autistic people respect, equality, dignity, choices, independence and good access to local communities that most people take for granted.

Where CQC have decided to take civil or criminal enforcement action against a provider, we will publish this information on our website after any representations and/ or appeals have been concluded.

People's experience of the service

Updated 21 January 2025

People and their relatives gave positive feedback about the care provided; however, we identified shortfalls in external reporting to ensure people were consistently protected from the risks of harm and abuse. People’s relatives gave feedback on difficulties they experienced in communicating and accessing information from the registered manager, but did tell us they felt well supported by the deputy manager who was consistently based at the service. People’s night time care needs had not been considered in relation to night time staffing levels to ensure sufficient numbers of suitably trained staff were on shift, particularly in the event of needing to respond to an emergency such as a fire.

Our assessment found the care provided mainly met expected standards, in line with the right support, right care, right culture guidelines. People mainly received personalised care tailored to their individual needs, wishes and preferences. Staff understood people’s needs well and supported them to have maximum levels of choice and independence. People told us they liked living at the service, were fond of the staff and enjoyed regularly accessing the local community, as well as going on outings and spending time with their relatives. People were supported to access specialist support from external health and social care professionals to ensure equity in access and care outcomes. People’s relatives gave positive feedback about the standards of care and support provided, 1 relative stated, “Staff are good. They are approachable and friendly. I think they know my loved one well and know what they are doing. It is always kept clean.”