Updated 11 January 2020
The inspection
We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. We checked whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act. We looked at the overall quality of the service and provided a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.
Inspection team
The inspection was carried out by an inspector, an assistant inspector and an Expert by Experience. An Expert by Experience is a person who has personal experience of using or caring for someone who uses this type of care service.
Service and service type
This service is a domiciliary care agency. It provides personal care to people living in their own homes.
The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission. This means that they and the provider are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.
Notice of inspection
This inspection was announced.
We gave the service 24 hours’ notice of the inspection. This was because we needed to be sure that the provider or registered manager would be in the office to support the inspection.
Inspection activity started on 27 November 2019 and ended on 4 December 2019. We visited the office location on 27 November and 4 December 2019. Our Expert by Experience carried out telephone interviews with people using the service on 29 November and 2nd December 2019.
What we did before inspection
We reviewed information we had received about the service since the last inspection. We sought feedback from the local authority and professionals who work with the service. We used the information the provider sent us in the provider information return. This is information providers are required to send us with key information about their service, what they do well, and improvements they plan to make. This information helps support our inspections. We used all of this information to plan our inspection.
During the inspection
We spoke with six people and five relatives by telephone and visited two people and in their own home so they could tell us their views of Agincare UK New Milton and the way staff provided their care and support. We spoke with the registered manager, a field care supervisor, a regional field care supervisor and four care staff. We also spoke with the business development manager who attended to support the inspection.
We reviewed six people’s care records and medication records and pathway tracked 2 people’s care. Pathway tracking enables us to check that people have received all the care they required. We looked at four staff files in relation to recruitment and staff supervision and other records relating to the management and monitoring of the quality of the service such as audits and surveys.
After the inspection
We continued to seek clarification from the provider to validate evidence found, including training and audit information. We were unable to obtain feedback from care and health professionals.