• Care Home
  • Care home

Dovecote Residential Care Home

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Hugar Road, High Spen, Rowlands Gill, Tyne and Wear, NE39 2BQ (01207) 544441

Provided and run by:
Sanctuary Care Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile

Report from 22 October 2024 assessment

On this page

Responsive

Good

Updated 31 December 2024

Responsive – this means we looked for evidence that the service met people’s needs. At the last inspection we rated this key question requires improvement. At this assessment the rating has changed to good. This meant people’s needs were met through good organisation and delivery.

This service scored 79 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Person-centred Care

Score: 3

The service made sure people were at the centre of their care and treatment choices and they decided, in partnership with people, how to respond to any relevant changes in people’s needs. Care plans and risk assessments were reviewed to make sure these met people’s needs and reflected their wishes. A relative told us, “I come up on a day trip to spend time with [person’s name] when my work allows. I can arrive anytime and staff are always welcoming and fill me in on what has been going on.”

Care provision, Integration and continuity

Score: 4

The service understood the diverse health and care needs of people and their local communities, so care was joined-up, flexible and supported choice and continuity. Staff worked closely with health and social care professionals to make sure people received joined up care, which was tailored to their needs. The activity co-ordinators and housekeepers along with the staff team were passionate about providing a programme of events which were tailored to everyone’s tastes. They had brought in external professionals to run weekly chair exercise classes, also staff had learnt how to run ‘sing for your brain’ sessions and routinely danced, sang and played musical instruments with people. We observed people were really enjoyed in these activities. Relatives reported people were more social and routinely chatted to people about want was going on in the home. A person said, “We have a great time at the singing sessions. It’s like a big party and we all join in.” A relative said, “There is now a TV screen with pictures of the activities and what everyone has been up to, so you can see for yourself. It helps show how they have been including [person’s name] in things (activities).”

Providing Information

Score: 3

The service supplied appropriate, accurate and up-to-date information in formats that were tailored to individual needs. Information was available in a variety of formats and ways they could understand. Communication plans were in place. Care staff told us they had information about, and understood people’s communication needs. We observed staff effectively supported people to fully express themselves. A person said, “I can understand the information they give out, no problem. They always explain first, they always knock and ask if I want a cup of tea. They tell me about changes.”

Listening to and involving people

Score: 3

The service made it easy for people to share feedback and ideas, or raise complaints about their care, treatment and support. They involved people in decisions about their care and told them what had changed as a result. Overall, people and relatives felt the registered manager and staff listened to them and acted on any concerns. When people raised a complaint the registered manager appropriately responded and resolved these. A person said, “All the staff are really good and I can’t fault them. I can honestly say I’m confident if I needed to raise anything it would be sorted straight away.”

Equity in access

Score: 3

The service made sure that people could access the care, support and treatment they needed when they needed it. Discussions with staff showed they understood how to access specialist health or social care support people might need.

Equity in experiences and outcomes

Score: 3

Staff and leaders actively listened to information about people who are most likely to experience inequality in experience or outcomes and tailored their care, support and treatment in response to this. For example, staff completed training in equality and diversity to understand and reduce inequalities or prejudices that affected outcomes for people. The registered manager ensured peoples’ social and healthcare needs were fully considered and met.

Planning for the future

Score: 3

People were supported to plan for important life changes, so they could have enough time to make informed decisions about their future, including at the end of their life. Staff understood how to deliver this should it ever be needed and some had recently completed in-depth training in supporting people at the end of their life. A staff member said, “We always try to give people the best care possible and, when appropriate make their end of their life as comfortable as possible.”