Bridlington Manor

On this page

• Overview
• Learning culture
• Safe systems, pathways and transitions
• Safeguarding
• Involving people to manage risks
• Safe environments
• Safe and effective staffing
• Infection prevention and control
• Medicines optimisation

There was no evidence many of the required actions identified during CQC’s last on-site visit regarding premises and equipment had been undertaken. Equipment and the premises were not always well-maintained. Arrangements were not in place to monitor the safety and upkeep of the premises. Appropriate and regular checks did not take place. We found no evidence people had been harmed as a result. However, this is a breach of Regulation 15 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

This service scored 59 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

We did not look at Learning culture during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Safe.

We did not look at Safe systems, pathways and transitions during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Safe.

We did not look at Safeguarding during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Safe.

We did not look at Involving people to manage risks during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Safe.

We did not speak to people as part of our assessment of safe environment. However, we reviewed some care documents as part of our assessment. Care plans reviewed were up-to-date and daily notes showed the person received appropriate care.

People were not cared for in a safe environment. There was no evidence regular checks on the premises, or the environment took place. A room temperature record for rooms used by people had commenced within the last month. There was no evidence of any system in place to monitor checks on premises, or to ensure the premises were well-maintained. For example, actions identified in a recent fire risk assessment had not been undertaken.

There was no evidence regular equipment checks were undertaken. There was no evidence of any system to monitor regular checks on equipment, or ensure equipment was well-maintained. For example, health and safety requirements relating to lifting equipment had not been undertaken.

We did not look at Safe and effective staffing during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Safe.

We did not look at Infection prevention and control during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Safe.

We did not look at Medicines optimisation during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Safe.